Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
Forms
News
HOME
Front Page
GMN Photo Galleries
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Schools
Sports
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Sections
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2009
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Letters August 4, 2005
Search Archives


Letters

No public accountability if state roads are privatized

With regard to Assemblyman John Wisniewski’s “Your Turn” guest column (“Privatizing Road Won’t Benefit Taxpayers,” Sentinel, July 8), I agree with his assessment of the proposed privatization of one or more of the state’s toll roads.

My wife, Betty, and I have seen a similar proposal for a stretch of I-81 in Virginia, where her family lives. In both cases, we believe the proposals to be terrible ideas. However, if I understand the Assemblyman’s position on bond financing of road improvements correctly, I think that his position is wrong. Issuing bonds to finance long-term capital improvements has been a legitimate means of raising money for upfront costs to be retired from tax dollars or tolls.

Certainly, as unpopular as tolls and gasoline taxes are to the payer, they are, nonetheless, the necessary costs associated with public improvements. To turn the highways over to private vendors would be a terrible alternative.

I recommend that the state Legislature bite the bullet on this one and increase taxes and tolls as needed to replenish the Transportation Trust Fund. One way or another, the public will pay for these improvements.

They (we) may complain about it, but with the state government doing the charging, at least we know who it is. With a private vendor, there is no public accountability.

David Dax

Sayreville