Get News Updates RSS RSS Feed
Get News Updates
Real Estate
Automotive
Employment
Services
Classifieds
Market Place
Media Kit
Forms
News
HOME
Front Page
GMN Photo Galleries
Bulletin Board
Letters
Editorials
Obituaries
Schools
Sports
Online Obituary Submission
Featured Special Sections
Middlesex County South
Health & FItness Guide
About Us
Archive
Contact us
Services
Advertiser Index
Copyright©
2000 - 2009
GMN
All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Letters August 23, 2000
Search Archives


E.B. resident supports toll elimination

I found Nicole Vaccaro’s article titled "Toll Elimination May Not Work in New Jersey" (Sentinel Aug. 2) to be interesting and informative. However, I disagree with Melverne Cooke’s justification for having tolls.

Tolls are a road tax and, as such, they represent double taxation since gasoline taxes already cover road maintenance. At best, they are an unfair and inefficient way of raising extra revenues. At worst, they cause huge traffic delays, waste gasoline, add to pollution, increase accidents and prevent the state from obtaining federal highway money. Cooke’s argument that 25 percent of toll revenues come from out-of-state travelers as a reason for keeping tolls is poor economics since the elimination of tolls will save up to 40 percent (i.e., more money is spent collecting tolls than is spent on road maintenance, which is the purported reason for tolls in the first place).

In addition, E-ZPass will not solve collection problems because it is an expensive and complicated collection system, the cost of which will be borne by the citizens of New Jersey.

Many states have already done away with them. The elimination of tolls is the right thing to do. It represents fairness, will help the environment and is supported by most drivers, even many who rarely use toll roads.

Scott Ahlers

East Brunswick